By Kiara Bhatia
On February 20, 2024, in an interview with British Vogue, Emily Bridges, a high-profile transgender cyclist announced that she plans to fight the British Cycling ban in a legal suit with the European Court of Human Rights. Last year, British Cycling, the governing body for elite cycling in Great Britain, announced that transgender women would be prohibited from competing in the female category. The decision came after months of debate on the subject as well as a handful of other top female cyclists threatening to boycott racing unless Bridges was banned from female races.
British Cycling argued that this decision was made to keep the sport "fair". However, Bridges called the decision devastating and unjust, pointing out that cycling is already an elitist sport that lacks diversity. Additionally, she pointed out that not enough research has been done on trans athletes to show that they have a physical advantage over others in their categories.
The debate over transgender athletes in sports has become increasingly relevant in the past decade, and will likely remain a relevant discussion topic going forward. Do you think banning transgender women and men from competing in categories different from their biological sex is discriminatory? 
Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cycling/2024/02/20/transgender-emily-bridges-take-british-cycling-ban-court/
The issue of "whether banning transgender individuals from competing in categories different from their biological sex is discriminatory" is complex and multifaceted, and opinions on the matter vary widely. On one hand, concerns can be brought up that transgender individual may have different natural abilities that those in the same competition may not be able to meet. So in this case one may not think this to be discriminatory because it is a category which they might not be associated with from the start. However, like you said not enough research has been done to prove this. From my stand point, I think transgender individuals should be treated with respect and the social norms as to which they identify. Therefore, I do think this is considered discriminatory from banning a trans women to participate in a female sport if there is no evidence that they have different abilities/ potential. However, I will admit I am not the most informed about this topic and it being very controversial requires more serious understanding and attention to be able to fully state a firm side.
ReplyDeleteI agree that research is a necessary component of this debate. Not enough research seems to exist regarding the physical advantages transgender athletes might have over others in their gender categories when competing, and this research would be crucial in deciding how they should be classified in competitions.
DeleteI think this is a very interesting and relevant topic in our world today. The main factor I have heard people trying to build a perspective on usually pertains to levels of testosterone and how that affects physical abilities. But, I was listening to a podcast the other week, where they were talking about how there is new research being added to the conversation. Men have an advantage in visual spatial abilities, (it's actually around age three or four were something like mens throwing accuracy and distance begins to diverge from girls) with seeing things in space and perceiving where the body is and how they can interact with. Whereas women, have their own advantages in areas like social cognition/emotional intelligence, with reading faces, lying detection and local memorization. I am not picking a side, rather I think this idea being something specifically affecting males and females from a very young age is an interesting addition to this controversial topic.
ReplyDeleteYou make good points that men and women do differ biologically. While this could create a disparity in abilities, I think it's also important to recognize that even amongst a pool of same sex individuals, abilities vary significantly; there will always be individual variation in physical, emotional, and mental abilities. Therefore, in my opinion, I think valuing principles of inclusivity, diversity, and equality should be given priority. Today, with more knowledge about sexuality and gender, I think its important to push for equal opportunities in sports.
DeleteThat is definitely interesting because when this topic is discussed, the testosterone levels of trans females is usually the primary concern. However, as you mentioned, there are other gender-specific advantages that are not as physical that could potentially even provide trans females with certain disadvantages when they compete against biological females. I would love to listen to that podcast by the way, it sounds super interesting!
DeleteI think that this is a very important topic to discuss. In recent years, we have seen growing acceptance for members of the trans community, encouraging people to express their gender identity, no matter how that looks. While I do see some validity in the hesitation to allow trans athletes to compete in certain sporting categories, I do not think that it is fair to ban them from competing. As the other commentators have stated, I believe that a lot more research would be needed to make that decision. I do not think that we have enough of an understanding of how biological factors impact athletic ability to make this call. Additionally, I do not think that banning specific individuals is very clear cut. In another class, we talked about intersex people and the bans that have been put in place against them as well. There are individuals who identify as a particular gender, but hold characteristics of both male and female biology. For example, some women may have higher levels of testosterone. In this case, it is once again complex to consider what threshold is being used to prevent athletes from playing in the leagues that align with their gender identity.
ReplyDeleteI think you have a very interesting point about there being many different gender identities and characteristics that make banning specific individuals complex. I think one of the main concerns that people have related to this topic is trans female athletes competing in the female category despite having the muscle composition or testosterone of a biological male. One solution to this problem that I thought of was defining gender categories based on the testosteron/estrogen levels (or other measurable body composition metrics) of athletes. This would enable trans women who have taken medications to lower their testosterone to compete in the female category without an unfair advantage, while also not completely discrediting the gender identities of these athletes.
DeleteI think that would be an interesting solution to the question posed. I would be curious to see how trans athletes themselves would feel about this type of categorization, as I do think that would be a very relevant consideration about finding the best possible answer.
DeleteI think that this topic is very interesting and many people are going to have varying opinions on this. I understand why British Cycling made the decision that they did because in general, people that are born a man typically have superior physical characteristics and the competing females could view it is unfair for Bridges to compete. I also think that if Bridges competed and won, that many people would dsicredit her for her accomplishments which is not a good thing for anyone. I believe that a valid solution would be creating another competition that pertains to transgenders solely. This way, it would be fair to everyone involved and it would allow Bridges and peers similar to her to compete. Nowadays a lot more situations like this are going to occur and I think that leagues/events should start accounting for transgenders as well.
ReplyDeleteThe idea of creating a separate category for transgender athletes specifically is interesting and I actually read that British Cycling created an "other" gender category to solve this problem. However, Emily Bridges and many other trans athletes did not like this alternative as they felt that categorizing them as "other" rather than the gender they identify with is still discriminatory to trans athletes and does not allow them to compete at the same level or against other female or male athletes.
DeleteThis topic is very complex, and there are a lot of varying opinions on trans people competing in sports. However, when asking if banning trans people from competing in categories other than their biological sex is discriminatory, I think a flat out ban is discriminatory. From a genetic standpoint, there are people with two X chromosomes and one Y (instead of an X and a Y that indicates they are genetically male). This person displays features that are both male and female, so how would you determine if they are on a team with men or women? I think there is a lot of research that has yet to be done on this subject still, but I think it is unfair to flat out ban someone from competing because their gender identity does not match their biological sex.
ReplyDeleteGreat point! Sex and gender identity has become an increasingly complex topic as we as a society have become more accepting. That is why one of solutions for this topic was creating gender categories based on measurable characteristics such as testosterone or estrogen levels so that athletes competing category is not solely based on their gender identity, which as you mentioned, can be difficult to determine. I'm not necessarily sure if this is a feasible idea but I think it should be looked into.
DeleteI think this topic is super tough to talk about because a lot of people find it to be super important. This being said it is something that should be talked about especially if it is something that will affect our society and our wellbeing. I think that from a genetic standpoint men (XY chromosome) are more muscular, larger bone dencicity, and genetically built bigger and stronger vs woman. With this being said a Transgender woman should not be allowed to play in female sports. I think it is unfair to bioligical females and it is a unfair advantage.
ReplyDeleteI understand this viewpoint, however, one component that I think is important to consider is that while some people may simply identify as a different gender than they were biologically assigned, many trans people transition physically to achieve the same biological body of the gender they identify with. This can mean getting surgeries such as sex reassignment surgery or gender confirmation surgery. It can also mean undergoing Hormone Replacement Therapy which involves increasing or decreasing their testosterone or estrogen and/or reducing muscle mass. This means that many trans women have a more similar biological makeup to other female athletes, which is important to consider when deciding if trans women should be allowed to compete against biological females.
DeleteThe way I see it is that this argument goes 2 ways. Yes, it is discriminatory to tell someone that they can't do what they love because of their gender. However this can sometimes put the trans athletes at a major advantage against others. For example there was a trans college swimmer that was born a biological male who dominated the women's swimming league. This athlete broke almost every record that there is solely because of their physical advantages when it comes to sports. A simple fix to this would be regulations for testosterone or estrogen levels, but even this is discriminatory towards the trans community. This is a very sensitive topic that I am very interested to see play out in the future.
ReplyDeleteTylerB